Arbiter LE

Training Administration

Officer compliance, module completion, and assessment records — Law Enforcement Training Platform.

Filter:

Officer	Badge	Assigned	Completed	Avg Score	Last Activity	Status

Filter:

Module 1 — Search & Seizure

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)	Case Law	Investigative stop requires individualized reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity; protective frisk requires separate officer safety justification grounded in specific articulable facts — not a general hunch.
Commonwealth v. Enimpah, 630 Pa. 357 (2014)	Case Law	Odor of marijuana may establish probable cause under totality of circumstances in Pennsylvania; courts scrutinize whether officer testimony is specific, credible, and documented — not conclusory.
Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015)	Case Law	Traffic stop may not be extended beyond the time needed to complete its original mission without independent reasonable suspicion; timeline documentation essential when K9 or additional investigative steps are involved.
Pa. Const. Art. I, § 8	Statute	Pennsylvania Constitution provides broader search-and-seizure protections than the federal Fourth Amendment floor in certain circumstances; state courts may apply stricter standards.
MTPD ALO 1.2 — Vehicle Searches	Arbiter LE Order	Probable cause alone, without accompanying exigent circumstances, does not justify a warrantless vehicle search in Pennsylvania. Authorized exceptions: consent, plain view, officer safety frisk of passenger compartment, or exigent circumstances not created by officer action.
MTPD ALO 1.2 — Consent Searches	Arbiter LE Order	Consent must be documented on the Search and Seizure Consent Form (Attachment D) or captured on mobile vehicle camera. If neither is used, officer must provide a detailed written explanation in the incident report. Undocumented consent is legally vulnerable consent.
MTPD ALO 1.2 — Crime Scene Searches	Arbiter LE Order	"There is no crime scene exception to the search warrant requirement." First-on-scene obligation is to preserve and secure. Warrantless residential entry requires consent, probable cause with specific exigent circumstances, or hot pursuit. When in doubt — secure the scene, get the warrant.
MTPD ALO 1.2 — Inventory Searches	Arbiter LE Order	Inventory searches conducted on all vehicles in department impound; must be documented on Vehicle Inventory Report form. Officers shall NOT conduct inventory searches when the sole purpose is to find evidence — this circumvents the warrant requirement. If evidence is discovered, stop and secure a warrant before continuing.
MTPD ALO 2.1 — MDVARS Recording	Arbiter LE Order	Mandatory recording for all vehicle stops, pedestrian stops, vehicle searches, and significant law enforcement activity. Officers must provide disclosure statement to subjects. All recordings retained minimum 90 days. Erasing or altering any recording is strictly prohibited.

Module 2 — Use of Force

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)	Case Law	Objective reasonableness standard for all force decisions, judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on scene. Three mandatory factors: (1) severity of the crime, (2) immediacy of threat to officers or others, (3) whether subject is actively resisting or evading. All three must appear explicitly in every Use of Force Report.
Pennsylvania Act 57 of 2020	Statute	Significantly expanded statewide UoF reporting requirements. Any intentional use of force — including display of a weapon and verbal commands used to compel compliance in a threatening encounter — is a reportable use of force. When in doubt, document.
MTPD ALO 1.3 — Use of Force Continuum	Arbiter LE Order	Eight-level continuum; sequential progression not required — levels may be skipped given circumstances. Carotid restraints and all choke holds / neck restraints strictly prohibited except when facing imminent death or serious bodily injury with no other alternative available. Force ends immediately when resistance ceases or arrest is accomplished.
MTPD ALO 1.3 — UoF Reporting Requirements	Arbiter LE Order	Report (Attachment A) required when: firearm is discharged; action results in injury or death; physical force is used or alleged; Level 3 force is applied; or force exceeds Level 4. Must be completed before end of shift. Supervisor notification and scene response required. Medical attention (EMS) required when injury is known, suspected, or alleged — regardless of subject\'s claim.

Module 3 — Report Writing

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)	Case Law	Documentation standard: courts evaluate whether a reasonable officer with specific training and experience, facing the specific documented facts, would reach the same conclusion. Conclusions fail cross-examination. Specific articulable facts survive it.
MTPD ALO 1.3 — UoF Report Separation	Arbiter LE Order	Use of Force Report (Attachment A) is a strictly internal management document. Shall NOT be attached to regular incident or supplemental reports under any circumstances. Shall not be released outside the department without specific Chief of Police authorization. Must be completed before end of shift.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — DV Narrative Checklist	Arbiter LE Order	Every DV incident report narrative must address 12 mandatory elements when applicable: victim\'s second address; relationship; date/time/intoxication; weapons; injuries observed; injuries reported but not observed; evidence establishing crime; arrest decision with detailed explanation if not arrested; crimes charged; bail conditions; children present and relocation; prior incidents.
MTPD ALO 3.05/3.06 — Evidence Documentation	Arbiter LE Order	Property Record Form required for every evidence item received, completed before end of shift. Documents every chain of custody transaction — who had it, when, why it moved, and where. Paper packaging for all physical evidence; sealed with evidence tape; initialed across seal with date.
MTPD ALO 3.04 — Report Submission	Arbiter LE Order	All reports completed before end of tour of duty and submitted to shift bin for supervisory approval. Applies to incident, arrest, use of force, and supplemental reports. Late submission requires supervisor authorization — not officer discretion.

Module 4 — Crisis Intervention

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
50 P.S. § 7302 — PA Mental Health Procedures Act	Statute	302 involuntary examination authorized when officer documents a recent overt act, attempt, or threat establishing clear and present danger to self or others. Past psychiatric history or general crisis alone does not satisfy the standard. Document every observed element specifically — let the facts carry the 302.
Pennsylvania Act 57 of 2020	Statute	Officers must consider and, when safe and feasible, employ de-escalation techniques before applying force. Applies explicitly to mental health encounters. Document de-escalation efforts with the same specificity used to document any use of force or authority.
MTPD ALO 4.07 — Juvenile Detention	Arbiter LE Order	Juveniles shall not be detained in any cell housing adults. Secure detention limited to a maximum of 6 hours. Sight-and-sound separation from adult offenders required at all times. Continuous visual supervision by a sworn officer required. Fingerprints and photos taken for misdemeanor or felony offenses; records kept separate from adult records.
MTPD ALO 3.02 — Temporary Detention	Arbiter LE Order	All detainees thoroughly searched before entry regardless of prior field search. Males, females, and juveniles under arrest must be separated by sight and sound. All firearms secured in designated lock boxes before entry. Detainees may not be left unsupervised for more than 10 minutes under any circumstances.

Module 5 — Domestic Violence Response

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
23 Pa. C.S. § 6102 — Protection From Abuse Act	Statute	Defines domestic violence and establishes civil and criminal remedies. A PFA order is an enforceable court order — violation is a criminal offense, not merely a civil matter. Protected parties cannot waive the order\'s protections on the subject\'s behalf.
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9) — Lautenberg Amendment	Statute	Federal firearm disability imposed on persons convicted of qualifying domestic violence misdemeanor or subject to a qualifying protective order. When a DV arrestee is subject to such an order, officers are not only authorized but required under ALO 4.13 to seize any firearms present.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — Approach Protocol	Arbiter LE Order	DV responses: approach without lights or sirens within one block of reported location. Mandatory protocol — not a suggestion. Allows tactical assessment before contact and prevents alerting subjects who may escalate or flee.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — Mandatory Arrest Standard	Arbiter LE Order	Officers shall arrest the primary aggressor when probable cause exists for Simple Assault or qualifying offense between household members or intimate partners. Victim consent is not a required element. If probable cause exists but arrest is not made, the narrative must contain a detailed explanation of the specific reasons.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — Mandatory Firearms Seizure	Arbiter LE Order	When a DV arrestee is subject to a court order prohibiting firearm possession (PFA or similar), officers shall seize any firearms present. Each seized firearm documented on Property Record Form before end of shift: make, model, serial number, and full chain of custody from moment of seizure.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — Victim Notification Requirements	Arbiter LE Order	Following DV arrest, officers shall provide the victim with the department\'s domestic violence resource card and advise them of: arraignment timeline, bail conditions, shelter services, and right to pursue a civil PFA order. Completion of all notifications documented in the incident report narrative.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — No Release Instead of Transport	Arbiter LE Order	When a person is arrested and must be taken to a district judge for arraignment, officers shall never release the defendant in lieu of transport. Prohibition is absolute — no exception for officer workload, victim request, or subject cooperation.

Module 6 — Motor Vehicle Pursuits

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372 (2007)	Case Law	Officers do not violate the Fourth Amendment by taking action to end a dangerous high-speed pursuit threatening innocent lives, even when that action risks injury to the fleeing suspect. Legality of pursuit tactics is always evaluated against the totality of circumstances, including whether the pursuit itself was appropriate.
County of Sacramento v. Lewis, 523 U.S. 833 (1998)	Case Law	In high-speed pursuits, officers face Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process liability only when conduct shocks the conscience. Where officers have time to deliberate — including about whether to initiate or continue a pursuit — a higher standard may apply. Documented decision-making is the officer\'s protection.
MTPD ALO 4.02 — Immediate Notification	Arbiter LE Order	Upon initiating a pursuit, officers shall immediately notify communications of: unit number, nature of offense, current direction, approximate speed, and vehicle description. Supervisor notification and authorization required from the moment a vehicle fails to stop — not after the pursuit is established.
MTPD ALO 4.02 — Two-Unit Maximum	Arbiter LE Order	Maximum of two patrol units shall participate in any vehicle pursuit. This is a hard limit — not subject to supervisor override. Additional units shall not join. Stop stick deployment is the authorized road interdiction alternative, carried out by a unit not in active pursuit, with supervisor authorization.
MTPD ALO 4.02 — PIT Maneuvers Prohibited	Arbiter LE Order	Precision Immobilization Technique (PIT) maneuvers are strictly prohibited under MTPD ALO 4.02. Prohibition is absolute — no circumstances, offense severity, or supervisor authorization level creates an exception. Stop sticks are the authorized vehicle interdiction alternative.
MTPD ALO 4.02 — Termination Criteria	Arbiter LE Order	Officers and supervisors shall terminate pursuit when: (1) danger to officers or public outweighs need for immediate apprehension; (2) suspect\'s identity is known and arrest feasible by other means; (3) offense is a summary violation with feasible later arrest; or (4) a superior officer orders termination. Each termination decision documented with specific basis.
MTPD ALO 4.02 — Post-Pursuit Reporting	Arbiter LE Order	Every pursuit requires documentation: basis for initiation, all notifications made, basis and time of termination, last known location and direction. On-duty supervisor completes Pursuit Review Form within 24 hours of any pursuit regardless of outcome.
MTPD ALO 4.02 — Stop Stick Authorization	Arbiter LE Order	Stop sticks may be deployed only with supervisor authorization and only by a unit not actively in pursuit. Deploying unit must provide the pursuing unit with precise deployment location before deployment. The department-authorized alternative to additional pursuit units and PIT maneuvers.

Module 7 — Leadership & Supervision

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)	Case Law	Individualized reasonable articulable suspicion required for each investigative stop. Group presence in a location does not supply the basis for individual stops. Running subjects without lawful basis creates Fourth Amendment violations and civil exposure — and models that behavior for junior officers watching.
18 Pa. C.S. § 3503 — Criminal Trespass	Statute	For a lawful trespass order, property must be posted with conspicuous signage, fenced in a manner designed to exclude intruders, or the subject must have received direct communication that entry is not permitted. Officers must verify these elements are met before taking enforcement action on a trespass complaint.
MTPD ALO 1.01 — Chain of Command	Arbiter LE Order	All officers are expected to operate within the chain of command and support supervisory decisions in the field. Officers who identify concerns with a directive shall address them through proper channels — not in the field in front of personnel or the public. Senior officers carry responsibility for modeling this standard at every patrol contact.
PERF — Leadership & Supervisory Readiness Research	Research	Police Executive Research Forum: the top predictor of officer promotion to supervisory rank is demonstrated judgment in ambiguous situations. Teaching moments — brief, direct, one-on-one corrections at the patrol level — are among the highest-value supervisory actions available to senior officers.

Module 8 — Traffic Stops & Vehicle Contacts

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Pennsylvania v. Mimms, 434 U.S. 106 (1977)	Case Law	An officer may order the driver of a lawfully stopped vehicle to exit the vehicle as a matter of course — no additional justification required. The government\'s interest in officer safety outweighs the de minimis intrusion. Authority attaches to the lawful stop itself.
Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408 (1997)	Case Law	Extends Mimms to all occupants of a lawfully stopped vehicle. Officers may order passengers to exit without individualized justification. Authority exists independent of any additional suspicion — it attaches to the lawful stop.
Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (2015)	Case Law	Stop prolonged beyond the time reasonably required to complete its mission — even by a de minimis amount — violates the Fourth Amendment absent reasonable suspicion of separate criminal activity. Does not restrict action on probable cause that independently develops during the lawful stop\'s execution.
Commonwealth v. Gary, 104 A.3d 1169 (Pa. 2014)	Case Law	Pennsylvania adopted the federal automobile exception. Probable cause alone — without a warrant or exigent circumstances — authorizes a warrantless vehicle search in Pennsylvania. Odor of marijuana from a vehicle has consistently been recognized by PA courts as establishing probable cause. Document the basis specifically.

Module 9 — Emotional Intelligence

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Goleman, D. — Emotional Intelligence (1995)	Research	Identifies five components of emotional intelligence: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skill. In law enforcement patrol work, self-regulation and empathy are the two most operationally critical — self-regulation prevents escalation; empathy enables accurate reading of victim and subject states.
IACP — Victim Cooperation and Officer Demeanor Research	Research	International Association of Chiefs of Police: officer demeanor in the first 60 seconds of a victim contact is the strongest predictor of whether that victim will cooperate with the criminal justice process. Victims who experience the initial contact as controlling, skeptical, or dismissive are significantly less likely to provide statements, testify, or seek protective orders.
MTPD ALO 4.13 — Follow-Up Victim Contacts	Arbiter LE Order	Follow-up welfare checks on DV victims prioritize safety assessment and victim engagement over documentation efficiency. Officers shall provide information about the victim advocate program and PFA process at every contact. A victim who leaves the contact better informed and feeling respected is more likely to cooperate with prosecution.

Module 10 — Evidence & Chain of Custody

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Pa. Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 648	Statute	Physical evidence introduced at trial must be authenticated — its connection to the crime established through testimony. Chain of custody documentation is the foundation of authentication for all physical evidence. Officers who maintain complete custody records protect the admissibility of every item they collect.
MTPD ALO 3.05/3.06 — Evidence Handling	Arbiter LE Order	Property Record Form required for every evidence item, completed before end of shift. All physical evidence packaged in paper (biological evidence requires breathability — no plastic); sealed with evidence tape; initialed across seal with date; labeled with RMS incident number, item number, and any hazard designation. Stored in temporary locker until property room access. The form is the chain — treat it as evidence itself.

Module 11 — Officer Wellness

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Secondary Traumatic Stress — Clinical Research Literature	Research	STS is a documented physiological and psychological response to repeated exposure to the trauma of others. Law enforcement officers are among the highest-risk populations for STS, PTSD, and occupational depression. Officers die by suicide at rates significantly higher than line-of-duty deaths. Recognized indicators: emotional numbing, social withdrawal, cynicism, sleep disruption, increased alcohol use, intrusive thoughts, hypervigilance, and declining performance on calls.
MTPD Peer Support Program Policy	Arbiter LE Order	Connects officers with trained peer counselors — fellow officers who have completed peer support training. Contacts are confidential within defined limits. Not a disciplinary matter; does not affect fitness-for-duty status. Confidentiality limits: imminent risk of harm to self or others; disclosure of a serious criminal offense; court order requiring disclosure. The correct first step for officers experiencing stress who are not in acute crisis.
MTPD Employee Assistance Program (EAP) Policy	Arbiter LE Order	Free, confidential access to licensed mental health professionals for officers and immediate family members. Provided by an independent contractor outside the department chain of command — participation is not reported to supervisors. Sessions limited per policy year; long-term referrals available. Same confidentiality limits as peer support apply: imminent harm, serious criminal offense, or court order.

Module 12 — De-escalation: Legal Framework & CIT

Citation	Type	Key Rule / Application
Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989)	Case Law	Objective reasonableness standard applied by Pennsylvania courts to ask not only whether force used was reasonable, but whether the officer took reasonable steps to avoid the need for force. An officer who bypasses available de-escalation when time and safety permitted faces scrutiny under this standard in any resulting civil or criminal proceeding.
50 P.S. § 7302 — PA Mental Health Procedures Act	Statute	In mental health contacts, the officer\'s approach — particularly whether de-escalation was employed — is part of the record when a 302 is initiated. Document de-escalation efforts with the same specificity used to document any other use of authority. The 302 standard: recent overt act, attempt, or threat establishing clear and present danger.
Pennsylvania Act 57 of 2020	Statute	Codified requirement that officers use de-escalation techniques when safe and feasible before applying force. This is a legal obligation — not discretionary guidance. Officers who bypass available de-escalation create legal exposure for themselves and the department. Document techniques used, subject\'s response, and reason de-escalation was or was not continued.
MTPD ALO 5.4 — De-escalation Policy	Arbiter LE Order	Officers shall consider and employ de-escalation techniques in all situations where it is safe and feasible before applying physical force. The safety and feasibility determination must be a genuine assessment — not a conclusion reached after the decision to use force was already made. Authorized techniques include: creating distance, calm verbal communication, giving subject space to choose, reducing officer presence when safe, designating a single contact officer, and requesting CIT or mental health resources when appropriate.

My Training Dashboard

Module Title

Knowledge Check

Module Complete

Training Administration

Secure Access

My Training Dashboard

Module Title

Knowledge Check

Module Complete

Training Administration